TikTok

Report September 2025

Submitted
TikTok’s mission is to inspire creativity and bring joy. With a global community of more than a billion users, it’s natural for people to hold different opinions. That’s why we focus on a shared set of facts when it comes to issues that affect people’s safety. A safe, authentic, and trustworthy experience is essential to achieving our goals. Transparency plays a key role in building that trust, allowing online communities and society to assess how TikTok meets its regulatory obligations. As a signatory to the Code of Conduct on Disinformation (the Code), TikTok is committed to sharing clear insights into the actions we take.

TikTok takes disinformation extremely seriously. We are committed to preventing its spread, promoting authoritative information, and supporting media literacy initiatives that strengthen community resilience.

We prioritise proactive content moderation, with the vast majority of violative content removed before it is viewed or reported. In H1 2025, more than 97% of videos violating our Integrity and Authenticity policies were removed proactively worldwide.

We continue to address emerging behaviours and risks through our Digital Services Act (DSA) compliance programme, which the Code has operated under since July 2025. This includes a range of measures to protect users, detailed on our European Online Safety Hub. Our actions under the Code demonstrate TikTok’s strong commitment to combating disinformation while ensuring transparency and accountability to our community and regulators.

Our full executive summary can be read by downloading our report using the link below.

Download PDF

Crisis 2025
[Note: Signatories are requested to provide information relevant to their particular response to the threats and challenges they observed on their service(s). They ensure that the information below provides an accurate and complete report of their relevant actions. As operational responses to crisis/election situations can vary from service to service, an absence of information should not be considered a priori a shortfall in the way a particular service has responded. Impact metrics are accurate to the best of signatories’ abilities to measure them].
Threats observed or anticipated
Mitigations in place
Policies and Terms and Conditions
Outline any changes to your policies
Russia-Ukraine: No relevant updates in the reporting period.
In a crisis, we keep under review our policies and to ensure moderation teams have supplementary guidance.

Israel-Hamas:
We refined and expanded our newsworthy exceptions to allow the dissemination of content documenting from a conflict zone and legitimate political speech/criticism, while remaining sensitive to the potential harm users may experience from exposure to graphic visuals, hateful behaviours, or incitement to violence. As part of this effort, we introduced dedicated policies addressing content related to the Conflict, specifically in areas depicting hostages, human suffering, and protests.

Additionally, we strengthened our policies on content that glorifies Hamas or Hezbollah and on the promotion or celebration of violent acts committed by either side of the Conflict. To further enhance platform integrity, we implemented specific Integrity & Authenticity policies for Israel-Hamas-related content, with a focus on conspiracy theories of varying severity and unsubstantiated claims.
Policy - 51.1.1
Russia-Ukraine:
No relevant updates in the reporting period.

Israel-Hamas
Policy updates


Changes (such as newly introduced policies, edits, adaptation in scope or implementation) - 51.1.2
Russia-Ukraine:
In a crisis, we keep under review our policies and to ensure moderation teams have supplementary guidance.

Israel-Hamas:
We continue to rely on our existing, robust Integrity & Authenticity policies, which are an effective basis for tackling content related to the Conflict. As such, we have not needed to introduce any new misinformation policies, for the purposes of addressing the crisis. In a crisis, we keep under review our policies and to ensure moderation teams have supplementary guidance.
Rationale - 51.1.3
Russia-Ukraine:
Our Integrity & Authenticity policies are our first line of defense in combating harmful misinformation and deceptive behaviours on our platform. 

Our Community Guidelines make clear to our users what content we remove or make ineligible for the For You feed when it poses a risk of harm to our users or the wider public. Our moderation teams are provided with detailed policy guidance and direction when moderating on war-related harmful misinformation using existing policies.

We have specialist teams within our Trust and Safety department dedicated to the policy issue of Integrity & Authenticity, including within the areas of product and policy. Our experienced subject matter experts on Integrity & Authenticity continually keep these policies under review and collaborate with external partners and experts when understanding whether updates are required.

When situations such as the War in Ukraine arise, our teams work to ensure that appropriate guidance is developed so that the Integrity & Authenticity policies are applied effectively in respect of content relating to the relevant crisis (in this case, the war). This includes issuing detailed policy guidance and direction, including providing case banks on harmful misinformation claims to support moderation teams.

Israel-Hamas: 
We refined and expanded our newsworthy exceptions to allow the dissemination of content documenting from a conflict zone and legitimate political speech/criticism, while remaining sensitive to the potential harm users may experience from exposure to graphic visuals, hateful behaviours, or incitement to violence. As part of this effort, we introduced dedicated policies addressing content related to the Conflict, specifically in areas depicting hostages, human suffering, and protests.Additionally, we strengthened our policies on content that glorifies Hamas or Hezbollah and on the promotion or celebration of violent acts committed by either side of the Conflict. To further enhance platform integrity, we implemented specific Integrity & Authenticity policies for Israel-Hamas-related content, with a focus on conspiracy theories of varying severity and unsubstantiated claims.

In the context of the Conflict, we rely on our robust  Integrity & Authenticity policies as our first line of defence in combating harmful misinformation and deceptive behaviours on our platform. 

Our Community Guidelines clearly identify to our users what content we remove or make ineligible for the For You feed when it poses a risk of harm to our users or the wider public. We have also supported our moderation teams with detailed policy guidance and direction when moderating on Conflict-related harmful misinformation using existing policies.

We have specialist teams within our Trust and Safety department dedicated to the policy issue of Integrity & Authenticity, including within the areas of product and policy. Our experienced subject matter experts on Integrity & Authenticity continually keep these policies under review and collaborate with external partners and experts when understanding whether updates are required.
When situations such as the Conflict arise, these teams work to ensure that appropriate guidance is developed so that the Integrity & Authenticity policies are applied in an effective manner in respect of content relating to the relevant crisis (in this case, the Conflict). This includes issuing detailed policy guidance and direction, including providing case banks on harmful misinformation claims to support moderation teams.
Policy - 51.1.4
Russia-Ukraine: No relevant updates in the reporting period.

Israel-Hamas: 
Feature policies
Changes (such as newly introduced policies, edits, adaptation in scope or implementation) - 51.1.5
Israel-Hamas:
In addition to being able to rely on our Integrity & Authenticity policies, we have made temporary adjustments to existing policies which govern certain TikTok features. For example, we have added additional restrictions on LIVE eligibility as a temporary measure given the heightened safety risk in the context of the current hostage situation.
Rationale - 51.1.6
Israel-Hamas:
Temporary adjustments have been introduced in an effort to proactively prevent certain features from being used for hateful or violent behaviour in the region.